I.
The Transformation
of the World Economy
a.
Reglobalization
a.
Massive increase in global trade since 1945
i. Since
World War II, there has been unprecedented growth in world trade, rising from
$57 billion in 1947 to $16 trillion in 2009.
b.
Foreign direct investment, capital, and personal
credit
i. The
flow of money around the world is a major part of this history.
ii. Money
moves as investments in industrial projects in other countries, as capital that
can be loaned to various large and small borrowers, and as credit for
individuals (hence, the rise of credit cards around the world).
c.
Transnational corporations
i. The
world economy is increasingly dominated by businesses that are located in
multiple nation-states and sell their products in markets around the world.
ii. Fifty-one
of the top 100 economic entities in the world are not nation-states but TNCs.
d.
New patterns of human migration
i. In
addition to the movement of money, people are moving around the world in
greater and greater numbers.
ii. Push
factors include wars, conflict, and ethnic cleansing, and pull factors include
the lure of higher wages or just the promise of employment, freedom, and/or
security.
b.
Growth Instability and Inequality
a.
Unprecedented growth but what of stability?
i. While
the volume of trade in the world has generated great wealth, the cycles of boom
and bust have left many people around the world feeling vulnerable.
ii. decrease
in demand for something in Europe can lead to large-scale unemployment in an
African mine or a Southeast Asian factory, and a jump in the price of petroleum
can decrease production around the world.
b.
Unprecedented growth but what of social justice?
i. While
the volume of trade in the world has generated great wealth, it has not been
shared equally.
ii. This
is true internationally with the Global North enjoying most of the benefits at
the expense of the Global South and domestically as certain regions or economic
sectors in a nation-state might see rewards while others suffer.
c.
Antiglobalization movements
i. Faced
with these questions, an alternative critique of globalization has developed
that both challenges the assumptions of neo-liberalism and the status quo and
urges more equitable distributions of the world’s wealth.
No comments:
Post a Comment